Philosophical understanding of interpersonal conflicts in professional activities
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2024.3.70-76
Abstract
The relevance of the study lies in the issue of social interactions in the work environment, which are important for the development of organizational processes and the performance of professional tasks. This study uses a phenomenological approach to analyze positive relationship systems, taking into account their duration, quality and perception by participants. The results of the study showed that social relationship systems can have both positive and negative consequences, depending on the worldview of the participants and their ability to understand each other. The scientific novelty of the study consists in revealing the principles of the philosophy of interpersonal conflicts in understanding the very nature of the conflict.
The practical significance of the study lies in providing recommendations for improving the well-being of employees and the effectiveness of organizations, as well as tools for resolving interpersonal conflicts based on phenomenal dialogical principles. This contributes to the development of interpersonal communication skills, taking into account the individual needs of employees.
About the Author
F. R. Abdrakhmanova
Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after. M. Akmully
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Abdrakhmanova Florida Rivkhatovna, Senior Lecturer, Institute of Historical, Legal and Social-Humanitarian Education, Department of Social Science, Law and Social Management,
3A, October Revolution st., Ufa, 450008.
References
1. Bakhtin M.M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. – 445 p.
2. Buber M. Me and You. Two images of faith, 1995;(5(15)):98-115. (In Russ.)
3. Campbell Ian, Zechrist R.I. Why We Can't Eradicate Poverty: Towards a Integrity of Approaches – from Economics to Culture // Cultural Readings – 2020. Cultural Code in the Era of Globalization: Digitalization of Society and Education: Collection of Materials of the All-Russian (with International Participation) Scientific and Practical Conference. Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, March 12-13, 2020). – Ekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural. University. 2020: 196-197. (In Russ.)
4. Koroleva T.V., Torpakova E.A. Interpersonal conflict as a violation of the principle of dialogicity: a humanistic approach. Bulletin of Science and Education of the North-West of Russia, 2016. – 3. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhlichnostnyy-konflikt-kak-narushenie-printsipa-dialogichnosti-gumanisticheskiy-podhod
5. Marx K. Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 // Works. 2nd ed. Moscow: Politizdat, 1974;(42):41-174. (In Russ.)
6. Moskvin L. B. Dialogue is the most important tool for resolving conflict situations // Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2013;(6): 3-18. (In Russ.)
7. Fomin G.P. Management in Russia and abroad: Conflict models. Management in Russia and Abroad. 2001;(6):64-71. (In Russ.)
8. Anderson C. J., Fisher C. Male-female relationships in the workplace: Perceived motivations in office romance. Sex Roles. 1991. 25, 3-4, P. 163-180.
Review
For citations:
Abdrakhmanova F.R. Philosophical understanding of interpersonal conflicts in professional activities. The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin. 2024;(3(66)):70-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2024.3.70-76
Views:
65
Email this article 