Modern digital subject: ontological predicates
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.3.62-65
Abstract
At the end of the twentieth century, the Internet becomes an integral component of the everyday world. The postindustrial society predicted by D. Bell has become a reality. New communication formats produce a number of digital effects, as well as new axiological positions of users. Technological progress determines the modern specificity of information consumption, at the same time, the transformation of the subject as a digital actor takes place. The modern user is characterized by alienation from his own corporality. Physical activity is adjusted based on the data of the gadget. The digital evidence of the biological body becomes the basis of bodily experience. Controlling the number of steps, the time spent in different applications, work productivity becomes hyperreal. Simulations reinforce the existential horror of non-digital reality. The authors study the features of the transition from the culture of media consumption to the culture of media participation in order to show the actual predicates of the modern digital subject.
About the Authors
P. S. KotliarRussian Federation
Kotliar Polina Sergeevna, Associate Professor,Institute of Social Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of General Philosophy
N. O. Soldatova
Russian Federation
Soldatova Natalia Olegovna, Associate Professor, Institute of Social Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of General Philosophy; Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy
References
1. Krainov A. L. Clip thinking in the context of educational practices: socio-philosophical analysis // Bulletin of the Saratov University. New episode. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. – 2019. – T. 19. – No. 3. – S. 262-266.
2. Skorup B., Huddleston J. The Erosion of Publisher Liability in American Law, Section 230, and the Future of Online Curation // Okla. L. Rev. – 2019. – Vol. 72. – P. 635.
3. Murtazin S. R. “Death of expertise”, “revolt of the masses” and epistemic egoism of modern man // VIII Sadykov readings. XXI century: human variability. – 2021. – S. 122-129.
4. Litvina D. A., Ostroukhova P. V. Discursive regulation of female physicality in social networks: between thinness and anorexia // Journal of Social Policy Research. – 2015. – T. 13. – No. 1. – S. 33-48.
5. Preciado P. B. Learning from the virus. ARTFORUM 58/9, May/June 2020. https://www.artforum.com/print/202005/paul-bpreciado-82823 (accessed 05/01/2023).
6. Demareva V. A. Cyberbullying: a review of statistics // Psychological safety of the educational environment. – 2022. – S. 114-118.
7. Grove C. In Anchorage teen’s 2019 murder, catfished killer pleads guilty https://alaskapublic.org/2023/02/16/in-anchorageteens-2019-murder-catfished-killer-pleads-guilty/ (accessed 05/01/2023).
Review
For citations:
Kotliar P.S., Soldatova N.O. Modern digital subject: ontological predicates. The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin. 2023;(3 (60)):62-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.3.62-65