Hybrid subjectness: integration of the natural and the artificial in the modern socio-technical space
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.1.46-50
Abstract
The article explores the phenomenon of hybrid subjectness resulting from the integration of natural and artificial objects. The theoretical and methodological basis of the work is the tradition of overcoming the subject-object dichotomy. The authors substantiate the idea of hybrid, distributed subjectness, which arises in diverse network interactions. The article proposes to interpret the new subjectness by means of the «method assemblage» (J.Lo). The authors conclude that an unambiguous differentiation into subject and object is impossible, since these roles are mobile and changeable. A lot of heterogeneous objects interacting in the socio-technical network space show subjectness in relation to each other only at the moment of interaction.
About the Authors
E. M. NikolaevaRussian Federation
Nikolaeva Evgeniya Mikhailovna, Professor, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of General Philosophy
A. M. Kamaleeva
Russian Federation
Kamaleeva Aisylu Mudarisovna, PhD student, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of General Philosophy
M. S. Nikolaev
Russian Federation
Nikolaev Mikhail Sergeevich, Senior Lecturer, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of conflictology
References
1. Kuznetsov A.G. Mediation and being in the philosophy of Bruno Latour // Mediaphilosophy. Ways to analyze media reality. – St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg Federal District, 2010. - P. 244-257.
2. Latour B. There was no new time. Essay on symmetrical anthropology / Per. from fr. D.Ya. Kalugin. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University, 2006. – 296 p.
3. Delanda M. New ontology for social sciences // Logos. 2017. – T. 27. No. 3 (118). – S. 35-56.
4. DeLanda M. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. L.: Continuum, 2006. – 150 p.
5. Harman G. Fourfold object. Metaphysics of things after Heidegger. Perm: Gile Press, 2015. –152 p.
6. Harman G. Networks and assemblages: the revival of things by Latour and Deland // Logos. 2017. V. 27. No. 3. P. 3. URL: https://logosjournal.ru/upload/iblock/ff6/Logos_2017_3_1_1_Harman.pdf (date of access: 26.01.2023).
7. Latour B. Pasteur. War and the world of microbes, with the application of "Non-Reducible". St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University, 2015. – 316 p.
8. Lo J. After the method: disorder and social science. / Transl. from English. Ed. S. Gavrilenko. M.: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 2015. – 352 p.
9. Sivokon A.S. Actor-network approach: origins and perspectives in socio-philosophical discourse//Scientific notes of Kazan University. Humanitarian sciences. -– 2015. – V.157, book 1. – P.162-169.
10. Shahid F. Google Has Suspended the Engineer Who Said AI Chatbot Has Developed Feelings / https://wccf.tech/19a03 (accessed 29.012023).
11. Likhanova E. Open AI: the creator of Chat GPT and a potential “threat to humanity” https://rb.ru/story/openai-what-to-know/ (Accessed: 29.012023) .
12. Searle, J. Minds, brains, and programs: [English] // Behavioral and brain sciences. – 1980. – V. 3, No. 3 (September). – P. 417-424.
13. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Wiley Blackwell. 1998. – 520 p.
14. Ryle G. The concept of consciousness. M.: Idea-Press, House of Intellectual Books, 1999. – 480 p.
15. Dennett, D.C., 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 1991. – 511p.
Review
For citations:
Nikolaeva E.M., Kamaleeva A.M., Nikolaev M.S. Hybrid subjectness: integration of the natural and the artificial in the modern socio-technical space. The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin. 2023;(1 (58)):46-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.1.46-50