Preview

The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin

Advanced search

Socio-Political Prerequisites of the Class Approach: A Review of Interpretations

https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2025.4.69-77

Abstract

The article examines the genesis of the class approach to science within Marxist theory, based on a materialist understanding of history. Two key cases are considered: (1) the initial formation of the approach in Marxism and (2) its universalization in the USSR, where it became the methodological principle of all science. Various interpretations of the reasons for the emergence of the class approach are discussed: from a tool for defending the socialist project (Mannheim) to a means of overcoming capitalist ideology (Lukács). The Soviet experience is examined through various concepts: the exclusion of “incorrect” ideas (Firsov) or scientists (Malinkin/Lekur), but their criticism ignores the reality of ideological class struggle. Particular attention is paid to the transformation of the approach after Stalin's criticism of Marr's theory, which led to a performative shift and imitation of class analysis. An alternative is offered by the UCF-ml theory, which explains the failures by the alienation of science from the proletariat in the USSR while maintaining the party principle. The question is raised about the subject applying the class approach. 

About the Author

D. M. Petrosov
Kazan Federal University, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications
Russian Federation

Petrosov Daniil Maksimovich, postgraduate student, assistant, Department of Social Philosophy

420008, Kazan



References

1. Mannheim K. Ideology and utopia // K. Mannheim. Diagnosis of our time. M.: Jurist, 1994. Pp. 7–267. (In Russ.)

2. Lukacs D. Class consciousness // History and class consciousness; trans. from Germ., foreword by S.N. Zemlyanoy. M.: «LogosAltera», 2003. P. 179–302. (In Russ.)

3. Ippolitov G.M. The principle of party spirit of historical science: an irrelevant legacy of Soviet times or today's methodological reality? (discussion notes). Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015. 2015; (17 (3-2)):475–483. (In Russ.)

4. Firsov B. M. History of Soviet Sociology: 1950-1980s. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg, 2012. 476 p. (In Russ.)

5. Malinkin A. N. On the history of domestic sociology of the 1920-1930s: Soviet Marxism vs. «sociology of knowledge». Sociological journal. 2021; (3):147–174. (In Russ.)

6. Lecourt D. Lyssenko Рistoire réelle d'une «science prolétarienne». Paris: François Maspero, 1976. 269 p.

7. UCF-ML La situation actuelle sur le front de la philosophie: Contre Lecourt et Althusser. Paris: UCF-ML, 1977. 31 p.

8. Yurchak A. V. It was forever, until it ended. The last Soviet generation. M.: New Literary, 2014. 664 p. (In Russ.)

9. Fogarashi A. Sociology of knowledge and sociology of the intelligentsia (a new attempt to refute Marxism. Under the banner of Marxism. 1930; (7–8):194–206. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Petrosov D.M. Socio-Political Prerequisites of the Class Approach: A Review of Interpretations. The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin. 2025;(4(71)):69-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2025.4.69-77

Views: 12

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-5912 (Print)