Assessment of Conflict Categories in Media: Media Texts and User Attitudes

The accelerating digitalization permeates every sphere of modern society, inevitably causing various conflicts: between the virtual and the real, verbal and visual, universal and culturally specific. The current paper sums up a series of studies conducted within the framework of MSU Program of Development, Project No. 23-Sch02-16 “Conflict and Media: Theoretical, Historical, Socio-Cultural and Communicative Aspects”. It reveals a high level of media and information technology involvement in all areas of social life and the process of mediatization of social conflicts. The study of user behaviour in social networks showed that students and PhD students of Russian universities (n=112, aged 19–32) tend to explicitly express their opinions on social media, even if these contradict popular views; the cohort demonstrated a tendency to realistic self-presentation, and the aim to create a positive virtual image. Overall, the survey confirms a predominant match between the real image created by young social networks users and their virtual identity. Research on young users’ attitudes to gamification in key social spheres (n=53, aged 19–27) revealed an overall positive evaluation of this process ongoing I socialization and communication, though were reluctance to accept total gamification of education. An analysis of the use of evaluative vocabulary in media texts – one of the indicators denoting conflict emerging – showed a tendency that the texts include generally moderate lexical units comprising the category. Finally, a study on how native and non-native audiences perceive and interprete such polycode texts as memes showed that the congruence of the visual component appears to be the main factor ensuring the understanding and appreciating for a text created in a different linguistic and cultural paradigm. 

1. Vartanova E.L. Changing media architecture and digital platforms. Medi@ l`manax. 2022; (1):8–13. (In Russ.)

2. Goncharova O.V., Lipatova A.V., Napreenko G.V. Media Image of Artificial Intelligence in Telegram News Channels: Sentiment Analysis and Discourse Interpretation. Virtual Communication and Social Networks. 2025; (1(13)):43–52. (In Russ.)

3. Smirnova O.V., Shkondin M.V., Denisova G.V., Antipova A.S., Il`chenko D.S. Social indicators of conflict in the context of media and journalism: an analysis of the content of Russian media. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism. 2021; (10(3)):422–436. (In Russ.)

4. Smirnova O.V., Lobodanov A.P., Denissova G.V., Gladkova A.A., Sapunova O.V., Svitich A.L. Exploring visual culture of Covid-19 memes: russian and Chinese perspectives. Central European journal of communication. 2021; (14(2 (29))):259–286.

5. Mamedov A. K., Smirnova O. V., Denisova G. V., Sapunova O. V. Realization of the conflict between real-world and digital personality in media communication. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2025; (25 (2)):397–409. (In Russ.)

6. Mamedov A.K., Denissova G.V., Smirnova O.V., Sapunova O.V. Gaming as a potential source of conflict with real life: The youth’s assessments. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2024; (24 (4)):1096–1103.

7. Denisova G.V., Smirnova O.V., Sapunova O.V. The category of evaluation in modern Russian media. Philological sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education. 2024; (6):164–171. (In Russ.)

8. Denisova G. V., Smirnova O. V., Sapunova O. V. Linguistic and cultural universals as the dominant factor of meme perception. Philological sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education. 2023; (6):43–49. (In Russ.)

9. Sapunova O.V., Denisova G.V. Memetization of reality as a means of its deconflicting: a linguistic and cultural view on the deconstruction of a serial meme. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities. 2025; (9 (903)):79–89. (In Russ.)

10. Kartashova E.P., Axmedzyanova A.R. An Internet meme as the main type of creolized text in the self-presentation of a “creative person”. Vestnik of Mari State University. 2019; (3 (35)):426–430. (In Russ.)

11. Еco U. The limits of interpretation. Indiana University Press, 1994. 304 p.