The anagogical purpose of the symbol in the light of pagan and Christian Neoplatonism
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2025.3.27-38
Abstract
The study of the problem of the ontology of dialogue, the forthcoming encounter with God/divine/Other/transcendent is still relevant as a philosophical understanding of the practice of "spiritual exercise", as a desire not so much to seek answers to abstract questions about the nature of the universe, but to leave man on his path to the original source of being. Therefore, A. Losev's concept, applied in the context of "post-secular thinking", allows us to look for such an understanding of symbolism in Neoplatonism and the Christian position, which leaves the philosopher open to the Infinite.
The paper explores the problem of the symbol in the perspective of Pagan and Christian Neoplatonism. In this tradition symbol is understood not as a sign created by decree but as a real thing, the main purpose of which is to serve as a mediator in the relationship between the sensible and the intelligible, the earthly and the divine. The symbol is a main connecting link, the main brace of the celestial chain that binds the cosmos into one whole allowing things to participate in the divine, to ascend to their prototypes, and letting the divine, in its turn, to «see» its reflections in the world. An important place in this process belongs to the practices of sacred acts, in which communication between the earthly and the divine takes place. Also important in light of this problem is the question of similarity and dissimilarity of symbolic images to the realities to which they refer.
Keywords
symbol,
synthema,
myth,
image,
theurgy,
sacred act,
Proclus,
Dionysius the Areopagite,
Maximus the Confessor
About the Authors
G. V. Avdoshin
Kazan State Power Engineering University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Avdoshin Georgy Valerievich, Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Institute of Digital Technologies and Economics, Department of Philosophy and Media Communications
Kazan, 420066
R. V. Modin
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Modin Ruslan Viktorovich (Hieromonk Roman (Modin)), graduate student, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of Social Philosophy
Kazan, 420008
References
1. Losev A.F. Thing and name // Being – name – space. M.: Mysl, 1993. P. 802–880. (In Russ.)
2. Iamblichus. Collected works in volumes. Vol. 2. On the Egyptian mysteries. 4 St. Petersburg: Publishing "Quadrivium", 2020. 352 p. (In Russ.)project
3. Proclus. Platonic Theology. St. Petersburg: RHGI; Letniy Sad, 2001. 624 p. (In Russ.)
4. Proclus Diadochus. Commentary on the Timaeus. Book I. M.: Publishing house “Greco-Latin Cabinet of Yu.A. Shichalin”, 2012. 376 p. (In Russ.)
5. Dionysius the Areopagite. On the Celestial Hierarchy // Corpus of Works with Appendix of Interpretations of St. Maximus the Confessor. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House, 2006. P. 34–120. (In Russ.)
6. Dionysius the Areopagite. About the Church Hierarchy // Corpus of Works with Appendix of Interpretations of St. Maximus the Confessor. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House, 2006. P. 310–396. (In Russ.)
7. Dionysius the Areopagite. Messages // Corpus of Works with Appendix of Interpretations of St. Maximus the Confessor. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House, 2006. P. 412–460. (In Russ.)
8. Maximus the Confessor. Mystagogy // Maximus the Confessor. Works. Book 1. Ascetic and theological treatises. M.: Martis, 1993. P. 154–184. (In Russ.)
9. Plato. Cratylus // Plato. Collected works in 4 volumes. Vol. 1. M.: Mysl, 1990. P. 613– 681. (In Russ.)
10. Petrov A. V. Phenomenon of theurgy: Interaction of pagan philosophy and religious practice in the Hellenistic-Roman period. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Chemical Institute; Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, 2003. 415 p. (In Russ.)
11. Chaldean Oracles / Trans. and comment. A. P. Bolshakov // The Ancient East and the Classical World: Proceedings of the Department of History of the Ancient World. [Collection] IV (Historical Faculty of Moscow State University). M.: EcoPress-2000, 2001. P. 140–157. (In Russ.)
12. Petrov V.V. Σύμβολαandσυνθήματα in the theurgic Neoplatonism of Iamblichus and Proclus // ΠΛΑΤΩΝΙΚΑ ΖΗΤΗΜΑΤΑ. Research on the history of Platonism. M.: Krug, 2013. P. 210–225. (In Russ.)
13. Mesyats S.V. Aristotelian physics in the Athenian school of Neoplatonism // Philosophy of nature and Antiquity in the Middle Ages / General ed. P.P. Gaidenko, V.V. Petrov. M.: Progress-Tradition, 2000. P. 274–289. (In Russ.)
14. Porfiry. Approaches to the Intelligible // ΠΛΑΤΩΝΙΚΑ ΖΗΤΗΜΑΤΑ. Research on the history of Platonism. M.: Krug, 2013. P. 760– 791. (In Russ.)
15. Petrov V.V. Symbol and Sacred Action in Late Neoplatonism and in the Areopagite Corpus // ΠΛΑΤΩΝΙΚΑ ΖΗΤΗΜΑΤΑ. Research on the history of Platonism. M.: Krug, 2013. P. 264–308. (In Russ.)
16. Louth A. Denys the Areopagite (Outstanding Christian Thinkers). London; New York: Continuum, 2002. X, 134 p.
17. Lossky V.N. Essay on the Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church. Dogmatic Theology. M.: Academic Project; Paradigm, 2015. 543 p. (In Russ.)
18. Zhivov V. M. «Mystagogy» of Maximus the Confessor and the development of the Byzantine theory of the image / USSR Academy of Sciences, Scientific Council on the History of World Culture. M.: Nauka, 1982. P. 108–127. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Avdoshin G.V., Modin R.V. The anagogical purpose of the symbol in the light of pagan and Christian Neoplatonism. The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin. 2025;(3(70)):27-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2025.3.27-38
Views:
116
JATS XML
Email this article 