The evolution of the phenomenon of bureaucracy in the context of decentralization of power

The article provides an analysis of the concept of “bureaucracy” from the point of view of its evolution, in the context of processes of decentralization of power. The article represents a theoretical study and sociological understanding of this phenomenon, as well as the processes that determine its development in the post-modern era. The authors analyzed existing theories and approaches to the study of bureaucracy; shows the prerequisites and conditions influencing the change in the appearance of the bureaucracy; the influence of the processes of decentralization of power on the evolution of approaches to its study is analyzed. Identification of the main prerequisites, causes and trends in the evolution of ideas is a necessary methodological basis. This allows us to build theoretical and practical mechanisms for introducing decentralized power practices in modern societies. Based on the analysis, the authors conclude the following: the modern appearance of bureaucracy in theoretical ideas is characterized by the presence of publicity, various platforms for interaction between society and government. It is also necessary to present a mechanism for the co-participation of citizens and other structures of society (local communities, business communities, non-profit organizations) in public administration. Taken together, communication theory and information society theories have led to the current state of bureaucracy theory in the course of its evolution.

1. Kapoguzov E.A. The theory of public choice as a theoretical foundation for public administration reforms.Bulletin of NSU. Series: Socio-economic sciences.2012; (12(2)): 21-30.(In Russ.)

2. Patrushev S.V. Institutionalism in political science: stages, trends, ideas, problems. Political science. 2001; (2): 146- 186.(In Russ.)

3. Castells M. Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International journal of communication. Los Angeles. 2007;(1): 238–266.

4. Andriyanova T.V. «Public dialogue» and its management perspectives in the communication theory of B. Pierce and W. Cronen.Communicology.2021; (9(1)): 151-159. (In Russ.)

5. Bezvikonnaya E.V. Political communicative potential of local government in the model of selforganization: dis. ... Dr. Polit. sciences: 23.00.02. Saint Petersburg, 2013. 436 p. (In Russ.)

6. Slok V.I. Social management in a risk society: philosophical analysis: Dis... Cand. Philosopher Sciences: 09.00.11. Ufa, 2017. 159 p.(In Russ.)

7. Fomin G.A. Determination of statepolitical management in the context of theories of interaction between political power and bureaucracy. State and municipal management. Scientific notes. 2018; (4): 266- 270. (In Russ.)

8. Habermas Yu. Moral consciousness and communicative action / Transl. with him. Ed. D.V. Sklyadneva. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2006. 380 p. (In Russ.)

9. Khutinaev I.D. Decentralization of state power as an element of the theory of institutionalization. Sociology of power. 2005; (6): 83-95. (In Russ.)

10. Sharkov F.I. Social networks as the basis for the formation of the space of public communications. Communicology. 2019; (7(4)): 32-40. (In Russ.)

11. Parrish R. The changing nature of communities. Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics. 2002;(15(2)): 56-68.

12. Pearce W.B., Pearce K.A. Extending the Theory of the Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) Through a Community Dialogue Process. Communication Theory. 2000;(4):405-423.

13. Maslovsky M.V. Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy and modern political sociology. Monograph. N. Novgorod: Publishing house Nizhegorodsk. state Univ., 1997. 211 p. (In Russ.)

14. Weber M. Political works, 1895-1919 / Trans. with him. B.M. Skuratova; afterword T.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Praxis, 2003. 424 p. (In Russ.)

15. Marx K. Towards a critique of Hegel’s philosophy of law.Marx K., Engels F. Works.1961; (19), Ed. 2nd. M.: State Publishing House of Political Literature: 26-30. (In Russ.)

16. Butmi E. Development of the state and social system of England. M., 1904. 342 p. (In Russ.)

17. Khutinaev I.D. Ibidem.(In Russ.)

18. Kapoguzov E.A. Ibidem.(In Russ.)

19. Niskanen N.W. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. 2nded. Vermont: EdwardElgar, 1994. 332 р.

20. Parkinson S.N. Parkinson's Laws: Collection: Trans. from English / Comp. and ed. preface V.S. Muravyov. M.: Progress, 1989. 448 p.(In Russ.)

21. Buchanan J., Tulloch G. Calculation of agreement. Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Nobel laureates in economics. James Buchanan. M.: Taurus Alpha, 1997. 556 p.(In Russ.)

22. Tullock G. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington: Public Affairs Press, 1965. 398 р.

23. Downs E. Life cycle of bureaucratic structures.Classics of public administration theory: American school / Ed. J. Shafritz, A. Hyde; Per. from English T. I. Borisenko et al. M.: Moscow State University Publishing House, 2003: 341-361.(In Russ.)

24. Downs A. Officials Milieu, Motives and Goals.The Foundation of Bureaucracy in Economic and Social Thought / Eds. B. Jenkins, C. Edward. UK: Page Edwar Elgar Publishing Chelternham; Northhampton, MA, USA, 2004;(1): 661–674.

25. Niskanen V. Special economics of bureaucracy.Milestones of economic thought. Welfare economics and public choice. 2004; (4). St. Petersburg: Economic School: 477– 493. (In Russ.)

26. Niskanen N.W.Ibidem.

27. Niskanen N.W. Ibidem.(In Russ.)

28. Habermas Yu. Ibidem.(In Russ.)

29. Castells M.Ibidem.

30. Vladimirova K.A. Methodology of sociological study of regional management. Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists. 2018; (2(5)):131-134. (In Russ.)

31. Sharkov F.I. Decree. op. (In Russ.)