The conflict-generating nature of texts dedicated to the childfree phenomenon: sociological analysis
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.6.46-51
Abstract
In the modern information society, memes, demotivators, comments on posts require a necessary role within the framework of collective consciousness and public opinion. They are able to effectively manage semantic components and changes in people, managing emotions and reactions. The “childfree” category, which is actively discussed on the Internet today, is no exception. This article provides an analysis of posts and comments from the social network “VKontakte” about children’s and childless lifestyles. The conflicting nature of the texts is revealed.
Keywords
childfree,
voluntary childlessness,
transformation of values,
conflictprone text,
memes and demotivators,
social networks
Supporting agencies: The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-18-20091, https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-20091/ at Pyatigorsk State University.
About the Author
E. I. Garayeva
Ural Institute of Management, branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Garayeva Elnara Ilfatovna, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Personnel Management and Sociology
6200144, Ekaterinburg, st. 8 March, no. 66
References
1. Garayeva E.I. Voluntary childlessness in modern Russia: sociological analysis. Text of the dissertation. 2022. P.197. (In Russ.)
2. Garayeva E. I. Assessment by the population of the metropolis of the phenomenon of voluntary childlessness (based on materials from a study of the city of Yekaterinburg) / E. I. Garayeva // XXII Ural sociological readings. National projects and socio-economic development of the Ural region: materials of the AllRussian scientific and practical conference (Ekaterinburg, March 17–18, 2020). – Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House, 2020. P. 364-368. (In Russ.)
3. Dadaeva T.M. Childfree families in the region: myth or reality? Regionology regionology. 2017; (25(3)):456-471. (In Russ.)
4. Vartanova E.L., Dunas D.V., Gladkova A.A. Media and conflicts: a study of mutual influence in current academic discourse. Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 10: journalism. 2021; (4): 3-32. (In Russ.)
5. Latu M. N. Cognitive models of transformation of positive meanings into negative ones in conflict-generating polycode texts of an extremist orientation / M. N. Latu, Yu. R. Tagiltseva. Political linguistics. 2021;(6(90)):176-182. — DOI 10.26170/1999-2629_2021_06_20. (In Russ.)
6. Ermakova L.V. Discourse analysis: modern approaches: educational manual / L.V. Ermakova. – Blagoveshchensk: AmSU Publishing House, 2021. 53 p. (In Russ.)
7. Garayeva, E.I. Linguistic and visual representation of the category “Friend or Foe” in conflict-generating texts of destructive influence. Kazan Social and Humanitarian Bulletin, 2022; (6(57)):34-38. (In Russ.) – DOI 10.26907/2079-5912.2022.6.34-39.
8. Latu M. N. Memes and demotivators about self-isolation: correlating semantic components and types of semantic relations. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2, Linguistics. 2022; (21)4):20-37. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2022.4.2. EDN OTVCFZ. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Garayeva E.I. The conflict-generating nature of texts dedicated to the childfree phenomenon: sociological analysis. The Kazan Socially-Humanitarian Bulletin. 2023;(6 (63)):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2023.6.46-51
Views:
89
Email this article 